Say what you want about Donald Trump — and the media certainly does — but the man plays the press like a Steinway. While breathless headlines warn of a looming trade apocalypse, a real estate mogul-turned-political Houdini is quietly choreographing one of the most strategic trade pivots in modern U.S. economic history. And the kicker? Everyone is too distracted by the shouting to notice the deal-making.
The Show: Tariffs, Tantrums, and Talking Points
At first glance, Trump’s tariff threats looked like the economic equivalent of firing a shotgun indoors. Sky-high tariffs in China, Canada, and Mexico? EU levies? The media exploded. Pundits wagged their fingers. Analysts predicted doom. Twitter melted down, and the media sprinted to see everything on Truth Social.
But here is the twist: the tariffs that matter did not happen — or got walked back, modified, or exempted into irrelevance. China’s final tariff rate? 15% is my guess, and there are so many exceptions that it might as well be a coupon. Canada and Mexico? A modest 10%, maybe? And only for non-USMCA violators. The EU? A symbolic 5%, maybe? With reciprocal tariffs erased like a bad tweet. Japan? If the car’s made in Tennessee, it is duty-free.
You might call this chaos. Trump calls it leverage.
The Strategy: While the Media Was Screaming, He Was Negotiating, and Tweeting Foolishness to Distract the Masses and Lure in the Media
Let’s be honest: Trump does not care if you like his trade policy. He cares if you watch it. Loud threats whip markets, grab headlines, and make America’s “tough guy” look like he is taking on the world. Meanwhile, the real policy — the one the markets and midterms actually care about — is being quietly negotiated behind closed doors with just enough flexibility to keep businesses happy and supply chains intact.
In essence, Trump threatened to blow up the house, then charged a toll at the door while everyone was running out. And nobody noticed. That is not chaos. That is revenue.
The Result: More Revenue, More Access, Less Risk
Despite the noise, the numbers tell a cleaner story:
- Tariff revenue is up. Moderated tariffs still bring in billions without choking off supply chains.
- Exports are up. Foreign markets, eager to avoid the “bad list,” are opening access and lowering their own barriers.
- Investment remains strong. Deregulation and tax certainty are offsetting the tariff noise, keeping capital flowing.
- Inflation is tame. With gasoline at $2.75 and reciprocal tariffs lifted, import costs are behaving.
- GDP is growing. Nominal GDP might clock in near $30.2 trillion for 2025, with solid 2.0% real growth in 2025 by my estimates.
Funny how none of that made the front page.
The Timing: Just in Time for the Midterms
If you think this is not about 2026, you have not been paying attention. Trump’s strategy is not just economic — it is political. Wage growth is holding at 4%. Inflation is behaving. Unemployment may tick up slightly, but nowhere near crisis levels. By 2026, Trump gets to say:
- “I was tough on China.”
- “I negotiated better trade deals.”
- “The economy is growing.”
- “And look — inflation is falling!”
And if the media tries to scream otherwise? Even better. Trump feeds off the outrage like a social media algorithm in a red tie. He knows there is no such thing as bad publicity and uses it to his advantage. The more dramatic the pushback, the more his base believes he must be doing something right.
The Final Card: Smoke, Mirrors, and Mastery
This is not just politics. This is performance economics. Trump starts a fire, then sells the water. He bluffs; they blink. And somehow — somehow — the economy keeps growing, trade partners keep negotiating, and voters keep watching the show.
So, the next time you hear a loud tariff threat or a scary headline about the trade war, ask yourself, is it really a policy shift? Or is it just another act in Trump’s carefully orchestrated smoke show?
Either way, the scoreboard reads: Trump 1, Media 0.
With the 2026 midterms looming, it is a safe bet the Trump administration will dial back tariffs, not out of kindness, but calculation. Lower trade barriers, paired with tax cuts and deregulation, will unleash GDP like a dog off a leash. The President may seem unpredictable, but that’s just camouflage; the man is MEDIA-SAVVY in a way that makes cable news anchors look like interns. Watching him work the political landscape is like playing chess against a guy using two queens and a fog machine—you don’t know where the attack’s coming from, and by the time it’s over, you’re not even sure what game you were playing… only that you lost.
It is possible
The final tariff assumptions outlined—15% on China, 10% on non-exempt Mexico and Canada imports, 5% on the EU, and a baseline of 10% elsewhere — may actually be a tad higher in the endgame of Trump’s trade strategy, especially if the administration’s goal is to walk the fine line of economic stimulus through deregulation and protectionism without tipping into recession territory before next year’s midterm election. A 2% real GDP target in 2025 is politically important: it keeps the economy “respectably growing” without overheating and supports corporate profits heading into next year’s midterms. But to maintain that growth, Trump needs to avoid tariff levels that significantly dent consumer purchasing power or spark a broader investment pullback. The scenario I provided does that.
So, while the tariff policy as modeled threads the needle — offering just enough pressure to extract better trade terms without derailing the economy — it’s reasonable to think Trump might edge tariffs slightly higher on specific non-essential categories (think luxury goods, green tech, or autos not assembled in the U.S.) to boost revenue and political optics without causing too much economic drag. These targeted bumps could provide additional leverage in trade negotiations and pad federal receipts — all while preserving the appearance of toughness abroad and ensuring the macro data does not slip significantly beneath that politically symbolic 2% real growth threshold. In other words, the real tariff floor may be slightly higher than it looks, just enough to stir headlines, not enough to tank the data.
SEC-Compliant Disclaimer: This newsletter is a publication for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or investment products. The opinions, forecasts, and commentary expressed herein are those of the author as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. They are not intended to be, nor should they be construed as, investment advice, personalized financial recommendations, or a guarantee of future performance.
All economic projections, policy scenarios, and political interpretations are based on publicly available information, assumed macroeconomic conditions, and speculative modeling. The accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this publication is not guaranteed, and the author and publisher expressly disclaim any liability for errors or omissions.
Readers should be aware that investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before making any investment or financial decisions, readers are strongly encouraged to consult with a qualified financial advisor or registered investment professional or conduct their own independent research.
The author may hold positions in securities or sectors discussed in this publication. Any such holdings do not influence the content and are disclosed in accordance with applicable regulations when relevant.